Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Vladimir Pantelic<[email protected]>  wrote:
 Felipe Contreras wrote:

 tidspbridge? That would be a bit cumbersome: tidspbridge_mpeg4.c
 --enable-tidspbridge, and so on. And inconsistent, because the library
 would be tidsp. But it's your call.

 If you add dsplink support, why not call it dsplink?

 and "dspbridge", works for me :)

The driver is not called dspbridge; it's called tidspbridge, and it's
called that way for a reason; it's specific to TI.

fine, "tidspbridge" then...

can we now move on?
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to