Felipe Contreras wrote:
2012/2/27 Måns Rullgård<[email protected]>:
Felipe Contreras<[email protected]> writes:
tidspbridge? That would be a bit cumbersome: tidspbridge_mpeg4.c
--enable-tidspbridge, and so on. And inconsistent, because the library
would be tidsp. But it's your call.
Since you named that library, you don't get to use it as an argument in
this discussion.
Who named the library is irrelevant; it's still *inconsistent*.
The name is libtidsp. You get to call libav support for libtidsp
whatever you want, but anything other than libtidsp, or tidsp, is
*inconsistent*. Kind of calling vaapi hwaccel, intellink hwaccel.
But it's up to you. Personally, the only option I think is reasonable
is tidspbrdige, but that's inconsistent, and cumbersome. Anything else
is even worst.
updated patch attached?
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
