2012/2/27 Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>: > Felipe Contreras <[email protected]> writes: > >> tidspbridge? That would be a bit cumbersome: tidspbridge_mpeg4.c >> --enable-tidspbridge, and so on. And inconsistent, because the library >> would be tidsp. But it's your call. > > Since you named that library, you don't get to use it as an argument in > this discussion.
Who named the library is irrelevant; it's still *inconsistent*. The name is libtidsp. You get to call libav support for libtidsp whatever you want, but anything other than libtidsp, or tidsp, is *inconsistent*. Kind of calling vaapi hwaccel, intellink hwaccel. But it's up to you. Personally, the only option I think is reasonable is tidspbrdige, but that's inconsistent, and cumbersome. Anything else is even worst. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
