On 2/27/12 6:15 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I still believe that's inconsistent and cumbersome, but I'll consider it.
Thank you
However, given the responses received so far, which I think are not reasonable, I don't really feel any motivation to do that any time soon.
I'd like to have your patch merged and so the other people since the discussion was just on the naming so it would be good enough so won't clash nor would cause confusion.
The fact there are bad overheads is something I'd like to have fixed notwithstanding the hwaccel patch.
lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
