2012/2/29 Christophe Gisquet <[email protected]>: >> + int mclms_prevvalues[64]; > [...] >> + int lms_prevvalues[512]; > > Those should probably be int32_t
Actually, all samples I tested it on never overflow int16_t. Even with dsp functions doing a lot of work, switching to int16_t is a 14% decoding speed gain. If I'm not mistaken, this was produced through reverse-engineering. Does the binary use the same buffers/accesses whether it is 16bits or 24bits content? Christophe _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
