Hi,

2012/5/11 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]>:
[...]

Not limited to that patch: could the reporter state instead on what
instruction the sigill occurred? It may be possible to do something
else.

Here, a cause could be that the movhps insn is sse, so the patch looks
either wrong (it should be marked as sse) or incomplete (another insn
is indeed mmx2, but this does not account for the sse insn).

-- 
Christophe

Attachment: 0012-rv40dsp-x86-replace-SSE-instruction-in-MMX2-code.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to