Hi, On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Christophe Gisquet > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2012/5/11 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]>: >> [...] >> >> Not limited to that patch: could the reporter state instead on what >> instruction the sigill occurred? It may be possible to do something >> else. >> >> Here, a cause could be that the movhps insn is sse, so the patch looks >> either wrong (it should be marked as sse) or incomplete (another insn >> is indeed mmx2, but this does not account for the sse insn). > > He means mmx2. I can look up what instruction it occurred on.
The problem is the pshufw emitted by SPLATW (see libavutil/x86/x86util.asm). It should use punpcklwd+punpckldq on mmx. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
