2012/5/14 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]>: > I mean the original patch I posted, which solves a sigill on my K6-III. > Its fate has yet to be decided; it got away from the center of attention > after Christophe posted some more patches of his own...
I think there are 3 options: 1) your patch, dropping support for MMX-only machines 2) my patch, supporting MMX-only computers, but forcing MMX2/iSSE machines to use code less optimal 3) something than Ronald asked me, more generic, a bit more resilient to such issues, but probably more complex So indeed 3) is the cleanest solution, but involves something that seems a lot of effort, for which I don't think I will invest much time on (I have other branches waiting for rv40 stuff to be dealt with). 1) vs. 2) are probably a theoretical debate. I proposed 2) because it followed my initial intention of providing the lowest denominator (the MMX2 code would be very marginally faster than MMX imho) -- Christophe _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
