On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am testing Jason's idea, which only need a little more memory. However, > > from the timings and preliminary tests I have done, I don't think it > scales > > nearly as well. > > I see > I've decided to stick with this approach for now, since it scales better at lower number of threads. > > A modification of Jason's idea might scale better, but it will require as > > much memory. > > Could you try to swap layouts depending on which threading system is used? > Tried this, and the speed hit is now ~1.5% for frame and single threaded. I'll try profiling and seeing where the issues are. Apparently I'm not allowed to attached large files, so here's my WIP patch if anyone has suggestions, etc.: http://privatepaste.com/dbeafd7e68
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
