Jason Garrett-Glaser <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Kang <[email protected]> wrote: >> Now, memory is allocated for each macroblock in the frame. >> >> Previously, there was an optimization to only need width+height*2+1 >> macroblocks allocated.
That sounds like it could easily hurt cache performance. > I strongly dislike this patch. Can we implemented sliced threading -- > a rarely-used feature -- without slowing down the most common case? +1 -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
