On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Kang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now, memory is allocated for each macroblock in the frame.
>
> Previously, there was an optimization to only need width+height*2+1 
> macroblocks allocated.

I strongly dislike this patch.  Can we implemented sliced threading --
a rarely-used feature -- without slowing down the most common case?

Jason
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to