On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:21:37AM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote: > On 2014-03-11 00:08:20 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:20:52PM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote: > > > On 2014-03-06 14:55:06 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > > --- a/configure > > > > +++ b/configure > > > > @@ -3805,19 +3805,19 @@ elif check_func dlopen -ldl; then > > > > check_type netdb.h "struct addrinfo" > > > > check_type netinet/in.h "struct group_source_req" -D_BSD_SOURCE > > > > check_type netinet/in.h "struct ip_mreq_source" -D_BSD_SOURCE > > > > check_type netinet/in.h "struct ipv6_mreq" -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE > > > > - check_type netinet/in.h "struct sockaddr_in6" > > > > check_type poll.h "struct pollfd" > > > > > > this looks misordered > > > > ? > > context missing, the next 3 lines in the patch are: > > | - check_type "sys/types.h sys/socket.h" "struct sockaddr_storage" > | - check_struct "sys/types.h sys/socket.h" "struct sockaddr" sa_len > | + check_type netinet/in.h "struct sockaddr_in6" > > resulting in: > > check_type netinet/in.h "struct ipv6_mreq" -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE > check_type poll.h "struct pollfd" > check_type netinet/in.h "struct sockaddr_in6"
Yes, I sorted by type name, not by header name. That seemed more sensible to me, but I don't particularly care as long as we clean up the current chaos. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
