On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/09/14 06:36, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> What would be a better reporting mechanism in this case?
>
> Options:
>
> (void) cast to make apparent we do not care about the value
>
> pass the context to avpriv_open and use av_streerror to report _why_ it
> failed.
>
> and whatever would make this call fail would make the open above fail as
> well.
>
> Courmish, which system does support FD_CLOEXEC and does not support
> O_CLOEXEC ?
>
> I'd drop that additional syscall and just use the O_ option.
>
> Making coverity happy is nice, but I'd like to take the reports as a
> mean to improve not just by its statistics.
sure, feel free to take over this patch then.
--
regards,
Reinhard
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
