On 22/10/14 18:31, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> Sure, I can leave out this patch and let somebody else look closer at
> which ones should be changed, if any at all. Some devices only seem to
> use it for pacing frame grabbing at a certain framerate, while some also
> set timestamps using it.

thanks, in _theory_ all the devices should have a start offset equal to
some shared time reference and then would be better that the clock is
monotonous since some unlucky people already experienced bogus pts with
the former non-monotonous gettime apparently.

lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to