On 24/10/14 09:01, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 22/10/14 18:31, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Sure, I can leave out this patch and let somebody else look closer at
which ones should be changed, if any at all. Some devices only seem to
use it for pacing frame grabbing at a certain framerate, while some also
set timestamps using it.
thanks, in _theory_ all the devices should have a start offset equal to
some shared time reference and then would be better that the clock is
monotonous since some unlucky people already experienced bogus pts with
the former non-monotonous gettime apparently.
Ok - I pushed the other patches in the set except this one, I'll leave
it up to you to check these ones (I'm quite unfamiliar with all of them)
and figure out if all of them really are ok with relative time.
Monday remind me to document how avdevice currently works so we can see
if that makes sense to everybody.
I hadn't had the time to make it any saner so ideas will be welcome.
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
