On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 22/10/14 18:31, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Sure, I can leave out this patch and let somebody else look closer at
which ones should be changed, if any at all. Some devices only seem to
use it for pacing frame grabbing at a certain framerate, while some also
set timestamps using it.
thanks, in _theory_ all the devices should have a start offset equal to
some shared time reference and then would be better that the clock is
monotonous since some unlucky people already experienced bogus pts with
the former non-monotonous gettime apparently.
Ok - I pushed the other patches in the set except this one, I'll leave it
up to you to check these ones (I'm quite unfamiliar with all of them) and
figure out if all of them really are ok with relative time.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
