On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 5/12/2015 3:45 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > Reviewer time is precious, so the onus is on the > > patch submitter to ease the reviewer's burden. > > Everyone's time is precious,
Sure, but somehow it's difficult to find enough reviewing eyeballs, which gives those eyeballs high "market value". > and doing N rounds of review and e.g. finding things the Nth time, > that have been present since the first revision, should not be the > author's burden. There's a line between what's reasonable for a > reviewer to ask for, and what's just obnoxious. I have no idea what you are trying to tell me. The reviewer should fix what the patch submitter failed to fix for n rounds of review? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
