On 03/04/16 11:26, Tim W. wrote: > Well, it's definitely redundant before my patchset. Afterwards, the > avpriv_request_sample is only printed once, so it's (slightly) less > redundant). > > Is there any sort of agreement about what I should do, before I amend the > patch? >
The patch is in, and the idea of the set is having less noise so worst case can we get a patch by somebody that has a stronger opinion on the level. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
