On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/04/16 11:26, Tim W. wrote: > > Well, it's definitely redundant before my patchset. Afterwards, the > > avpriv_request_sample is only printed once, so it's (slightly) less > > redundant). > > > > Is there any sort of agreement about what I should do, before I amend the > > patch? > > > > The patch is in, and the idea of the set is having less noise so worst > case can we get a patch by somebody that has a stronger opinion on the > level. Fair enough, thanks. Tim _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
