Hi, 2016-04-27 18:32 GMT+02:00 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]>:
>> btw, some of those codecs may or may not have used the old "unsafe" >> bitstream reader, ie where bitstream bound checking is left to higher >> level checks. I haven't checked individual patches, but is the same >> "safeness" used when comparing before/after in your tests? > > You're confusing Libav with FFmpeg. Over here First, sorry if I have appeared as ganging up on Alexandra and/or libav's activities. Nonetheless, I was probably inconsiderate enough to deserve that snark. My intent is here purely technical, trying to provide points I felt would help objectively evaluate the work. For some of them, I had already voiced them in Niels' original thread 2 years ago. But it seems we are several to reiterate them. My additions are just noise at this point, so I'm stopping them here. Sorry for any induced bad feeling, -- Christophe _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
