On 04/05/16 00:50, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > IMO Anton is right wrt common/uncommon, but Kieran is right for the > trailing number being confusing. > I would propose bitstream_uintread and bitstream_longread which would > make it perfectly clear the maximum length of the read value.
_32 and _63 is the least misleading naming, _uintread and _longread fails to deliver the important information and confuses even more. bitstream_read_atmost32 would be complete but overly long. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
