On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/05/16 00:50, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >> IMO Anton is right wrt common/uncommon, but Kieran is right for the >> trailing number being confusing. >> I would propose bitstream_uintread and bitstream_longread which would >> make it perfectly clear the maximum length of the read value. > > _32 and _63 is the least misleading naming, _uintread and _longread > fails to deliver the important information and confuses even more.
The crowd seems to disagree... -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
