On 14/10/2016 01:06, Diego Biurrun wrote: > Also, 12-bit, 14-bit, and 16-bit SIMD also does not exist, why not > start testing it as well right now? After all, the code might appear > in the future...
The term checkasm is misleading. The whole thing is a unit-test for some specific dsp functions. Having 1 or more implementation warrant wanting to test them (even just to make sure it does not explode when running, checkasm + ubsan is a nicer way to spot mistakes btw). At least in my opinion. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
