On 14/10/2016 01:06, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Also, 12-bit, 14-bit, and 16-bit SIMD also does not exist, why not
> start testing it as well right now? After all, the code might appear
> in the future...
The term checkasm is misleading. The whole thing is a unit-test for some
specific dsp functions.
Having 1 or more implementation warrant wanting to test them (even just
to make sure it does not explode when running, checkasm + ubsan is a
nicer way to spot mistakes btw).
At least in my opinion.
libav-devel mailing list