* Dhaval Giani <[email protected]> [2010-07-30 09:35:32]:
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * Dictionary of (name, value) items.
> >>> + * The dictionary keeps its order, iterator iterates in the same order
> >>> + * as the items were added there.
> >>
> >> OK, so order is important
> >
> > Yes, I think it is good idea to actually write the parameters in the
> > same order as they appear in cgconfig.conf. I'll write it more precisely
> > to the comments.
> >
>
> There is at least one case that I am aware of where this ordering will
> lead to a failure, and the ordering neds to be determined at runtime.
> Tommaso (cc'd here) has mentioned it in the past, and I agree with it.
> We need some mechanism to have dependency ordering (for example with
> the rt-cgroups).
>
What we'll end up needing is a dependency graph. Jan does the current
patchset affect the order in which the cgroup values are set. In the
current case I think we do bottom up (reverse order), does this patch
change that?
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Libcg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
