* Jan Safranek <[email protected]> [2010-08-02 13:08:20]:
> On 07/30/2010 12:01 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >* Dhaval Giani<[email protected]> [2010-07-30 09:35:32]:
> >
> >>>>>+/**
> >>>>>+ * Dictionary of (name, value) items.
> >>>>>+ * The dictionary keeps its order, iterator iterates in the same order
> >>>>>+ * as the items were added there.
> >>>>
> >>>>OK, so order is important
> >>>
> >>>Yes, I think it is good idea to actually write the parameters in the
> >>>same order as they appear in cgconfig.conf. I'll write it more precisely
> >>>to the comments.
> >>>
> >>
> >>There is at least one case that I am aware of where this ordering will
> >>lead to a failure, and the ordering neds to be determined at runtime.
> >>Tommaso (cc'd here) has mentioned it in the past, and I agree with it.
> >>We need some mechanism to have dependency ordering (for example with
> >>the rt-cgroups).
> >>
> >
> >What we'll end up needing is a dependency graph. Jan does the current
> >patchset affect the order in which the cgroup values are set. In the
> >current case I think we do bottom up (reverse order), does this patch
> >change that?
>
> Yes, it actually does. I was not aware that the setting was in
> reverse order... Wasn't it a bug? :)
>
Yep, you can call it a parser side-effect or a BUG! Fixing it to be in
the order written is the right thing to do for now.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Libcg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
