On 07/30/2010 12:01 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Dhaval Giani<[email protected]>  [2010-07-30 09:35:32]:
>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * Dictionary of (name, value) items.
>>>>> + * The dictionary keeps its order, iterator iterates in the same order
>>>>> + * as the items were added there.
>>>>
>>>> OK, so order is important
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it is good idea to actually write the parameters in the
>>> same order as they appear in cgconfig.conf. I'll write it more precisely
>>> to the comments.
>>>
>>
>> There is at least one case that I am aware of where this ordering will
>> lead to a failure, and the ordering neds to be determined at runtime.
>> Tommaso (cc'd here) has mentioned it in the past, and I agree with it.
>> We need some mechanism to have dependency ordering (for example with
>> the rt-cgroups).
>>
>
> What we'll end up needing is a dependency graph. Jan does the current
> patchset affect the order in which the cgroup values are set. In the
> current case I think we do bottom up (reverse order), does this patch
> change that?

Yes, it actually does. I was not aware that the setting was in reverse 
order... Wasn't it a bug? :)


Jan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Libcg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel

Reply via email to