On 2013/9/11 11:13, Weng Meiling wrote: >> >> as we can see, there is nothing when user do these operations, >> >> is it better to yield an error to let user known what happen?:) >> >> So in its current form, I refuse to apply the patch. >> >> We dont know whether applying the value failed because it was >> read-only, or because the name was wrong. This is just a hack, which >> might hide other issues later on. I would much rather have a check >> made (I am not sure where yet), which will confirm the file exists, >> and if so, check whether it is read only. >> >> Thanks! >> Dhaval
>From the user's perspective, if I do something, but can't get response even I >was wrong. It is terrible, because maybe I will wrong continuously. So I am strong to fix this issue. We did some tests about this patch, it can deal with the case: file exists, read only, or invalid value. It is just fine for us, and didn't find other problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libcg-devel mailing list Libcg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libcg-devel
