-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On May 10, 2012, at 9:04 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> A more thorough answer would involve the cross-section of MLATs,
> Military assistance treaties, and global copyright agreements.

Yes, exactly…  Basically, diplomacy involves a lot of trading unrelated 
interests off against each other…  Domain takedowns exchanged for food aid, or 
loan guarantees, or a partial relaxation of trade tariffs, or whatever.  So the 
more active the diplomacy between two countries, and the greater the imbalance 
of power between them, the less you want to hang your hat on the stability of 
domain names in the weaker one.

> For example, if you wanted to start a cool new file sharing site, base
> it in Iran, Iraq, Cuba, Libya, Syria, Belarus, Zimbabwe, or Burma.

Actually, I'd strongly disagree with that, for two reasons.  First, rule of law 
corresponds strongly with stability of the DNS…  In  a country with weak rule 
of law, high corruption, high volatility, you're likely to have an arbitrary 
takedown based on completely other issues:

http://www.neowin.net/news/nicly-down-as-libyas-response-to-vbly-takedown-spreads

Moreover, registering domains in such countries is often a matter of walking 
into the communications ministry, cash in hand, and showing your citizenship 
papers or domestic incorporation papers.

The second reason is in countries with volatile politics, like all of those you 
cited, things can change very quickly.  I just spent the last four days in 
Tripoli, and things are very different there now than they were a year ago, and 
they'll be still more different a year from now.  They're both becoming more 
religious, more political, and more aligned with and dependent upon their 
relationship with the U.S. government.  Make no mistake, it's an infinitely 
better place to live now than it was a year ago, and in general terms of 
"Internet freedoms" it's much better now and on a very good trajectory.  I just 
wouldn't count on it being friendly to interests to which the USG is hostile; 
that time is past.

And the same thing could happen in any of the other countries you cite, very 
quickly, if the political winds swing another direction.

In Switzerland, that's unlikely to happen.  On the contrary, they've been 
strengthening their laws protecting domains against _private sector_ takedowns.

                                -Bill




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=CGOY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
[email protected]

Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:

https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) 
next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"

You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in 
monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.

Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech

Reply via email to