<snip>
> > My point was for something off the shelf, I know of nothing better and as > > far as it goes... I'd say it's a step up for a lot people who should be > > using more secure IT technologies and methods than they are (such as some > > journalists), and they can take that step with minimal investment in time > > and energy and a chromebook will meet their needs. > > > > I'd suggest users have no hard disk and boot off of a Tails USB disk. > Now we've reduced the attack surface to the BIOS/EFI layer - something > that I suspect is pretty crappy all across the board. > > > <snip> I would love to be a fly on the wall of the IDF customs agent you have to explain this to. I see no OPSEC problem whatsoever in travelling with a laptop that has no hard disk. I cannot imagine any customs agent or other two-bit security bureaucrat having a problem with that. // See what I just did there? I attacked the specific *text* of your response, rather than what I believe to be true about you. I assume you'd not ever recommend that interpretation of your words to someone, so how does it help dialogue/discussion/liberation for me to engage in that line of reasoning? Brian
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
