Hi, > See that's the standard you're competing with. Most users don't own > server space, physical or virtual, and would not in a million years > be convinced to buy any.
and if you have your own server (not at home), they can go after you with legal assistence regimes like in the cybercrime convention (Art. 19 and 32)* or informal deals with your hosting provider or like UKUSA. Do you or anybody really think, that a normal, sold server in a remote location protect you, if you are a target? Only in a locations outside these eg. all legal regimes. I believe, that a broad adoption of a 2nd infrastructure/layer as with I2P, Freenet or Tor is more needed as the usual user recognize... perhaps now ;) * <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/185.htm> -- Katana -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
