If it's so easy, go ahead and produce a more secure alternative that people will use. Talking about how exceedingly easy it is in Internet forums doesn't contribute much.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Maxim Kammerer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Michael Rogers > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Google and Mozilla wouldn't have to run > > competitions to find holes in their own browsers. There wouldn't be a > > multi-million-dollar 0day black market. > > You are talking about huge projects with complex design, where the > architecture itself is a source of security issues. Not to mention > that WebKit and Mozilla weren't engineered for security to begin with. > > > It wouldn't be possible for > > the NSA (according to Snowden) to "simply own" the computer of any > > person of interest. > > Offtopic, but I didn't see any indication in that last paragraph of > Jacob's interview that Snowden talks about exploiting computers. In > general, Snowden for some reason is usually terribly vague for someone > who apparently exhibits excellent command of English language (from my > non-native speaker's POV). > > > Writing secure software is much, much harder than simply writing > > comments, writing tests and coding defensively. > > This is a thread about Cryptocat. Cryptocat is a web frontend for a > couple of protocols. Yes, it is that easy. > > -- > Maxim Kammerer > Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
