On 2013-08-05, at 11:04 AM, Michael Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hmm. So it's more of a 38-day. Perhaps there should have been a Tor Browser >> security advisory in that case. > > I'm not sure how long the Tor bundle goes without actively complaining > to the user about things being out of date. Out of curiosity I > reloaded a 48-day old beta of 3.0 last night, and it immediately > complained that it was out of date and should be upgraded to the > latest version. Yeah, Tor's update notifications are definitely legit. I'm just wondering why there wasn't an actual advisory. I mean, all this time there seems to have been a .js file that could compromise any Tor users accessing a website which loads it. NK > > Mike > -- > Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many > emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing > moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
-- Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
