> On Dec 20, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Erich M. <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Both miss IMHO the point. This was clearly a politically > >> motivated attack by a nation state intended to create the > >> severest immediate impact possible on Sony. Hitting the > >> technical, informational and soon > > > > you take a pretty evidence-free position on attribution here that > > seems completely unwarranted. > > Why? I did not attribute it to any organisation or nation state in > particular. This is impossible at this stage and I _do not believe_ > much in the North Korean connection either. > This was an attack of a pretty uncommon type, clearly intended to > disrupt Sony's business as long as possible and eventuelly destroy the > company thereafter
So, you claim it was a nation-state and politically motivated. When Joseph points out that there isn’t clear evidence to support your statements, you back-pedal. How do you *know* that it was “clearly” a “politically motivated attack by a nation state”? Al -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
