Not my list, I'm at best a lurker here although I do think I get
valuable information. I'm neither a Democrat or Republican either but I
don't consider myself (or this list) apolitical but I suppose I'm making
a distinction between partisan and political.
In any case my main point was that there was an accusation of "numerous
factual errors" with no supporting evidence or even specificity as to
what the errors were so we could verify them ourselves and no (to me)
obvious errors of fact on rereading the original post. With all the
whining about "fake news" lately that raised my hackles. Apologies if
that's inappropriate. I'll go back to lurking now ;-)
On 1/29/2017 20:13, Yosem Companys wrote:
From http://cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/about_libtech:
The Program on Liberation Technology at Stanford's Center on
Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law seeks to understand
how information technology can be used to *improve governance*,
*empower the poor*, *defend human rights*, promote economic
development, and pursue a variety of other social goods.
The past few years have seen explosive growth in the use of
information technology to defend human rights, improve governance,
fight corruption, deter electoral fraud, *expose government
wrongdoing*, *empower the poor*, promote economic development,
*protect the environment*, educate consumers, *improve public
health*, and pursue a variety of other social goods.
I did not write the aforementioned text. But...
* I consider refugees as poor people who need empowerment and need
help defending their human rights.
* I consider fighting against human-caused climate change protecting
the environment.
* I consider getting rid of Obamacare as inimical with improving
public health.
* I consider revealing fake news and politicized science by the
government as exposing government wrongdoing.
* I consider firing civil servants because they don't agree with
your views as not improving governance.
And keep in mind that I am an Independent. I am neither a Democrat nor
a Republican.
For those of you who have followed us for years on this mailing list
and Twitter, you know that we try to be non-partisan, as some of our
researchers are Democrat, others are Republicans, others are
Anarchists, others are Socialists, and so on. We try to tweet various
perspectives so long as they do not violate our principles.
Our number one principle is the use of technology to promote freedom,
democracy, development, and the rule of law. Any group that uses
technology to curtail the rights of some groups at the expense of
others is violating this principle.
Best,
Yosem
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Wayne Moore <wmo...@stanford.edu
<mailto:wmo...@stanford.edu>> wrote:
Such as? None that I caught. I would have thought "liberation"
itself was a strong political view anyway.
On 1/29/2017 13:59, Carolyn Santo wrote:
There are numerous factual errors in Leila's email.
--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google.
Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
<https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech>.
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu <mailto:compa...@stanford.edu>.
--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
compa...@stanford.edu.
