So then, Ronald Reagan, identified by the Christian Science Monitor 
as the ultimate NeoCon, is a "Zionist NeoCon" who led us into a 
police state.

David, can I quote you on that?  

I mean after all, the NeoCons are evil, right.  And worse, they 
are "Jews"!  


--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Again, since you have apparently been unable to understand so far,
> we do not hate America. Some of us hate the Zionist neocons who 
have
> captured "our" government and are leading us into a police state, 
World
> War III and a one-world totalitarian government. I suspect that 
many
> average Americans who love America would respond quite vigorously 
> to "our" leaders if they knew what was happening. That fact should 
> be immensely encouraging to those of us who are spreading truth and
> defending liberty and looking forward to the day when the American
> people become aware of what is being done to them.
> 
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>  
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 3:40 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Cindy Sheehan, Libertarian for 
President?
> 
> 
> > Why should this be an issue?  Why should you be worried that 
she's 
> > more of a "big government Progressive Democrat?"  After all the 
> > Libertarian Left has basically morphed into an arm of the 
Democrat 
> > Party.  There's no distinguishing any more between Leftist 
America-
> > hating Libertarians and Leftist America-hating Liberals.  They 
are 
> > one in the same.  Where's the difference?  When's the last time 
you 
> > heard a Leftist Libertarian criticizing a Leftist Democrat on 
> > anything?  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I haven't really looked into it much but from the soundbites I 
> > have 
> >> heard from her it appears she is a big government Progressive 
> > Democrat. 
> >> Of course soundbites can be edited. 
> >> 
> >> Either way I can understand libertarians encouraging her to run 
> > against 
> >> Hillary in the Senate Primary in 2006 and the Democratic 
> > Presidential 
> >> primary in 2008 and maybe even voting for her in the primaries 
if 
> > a 
> >> libertarian or a close libertarian is not running in the 
primaries 
> > if 
> >> it would help knock H Clinton out of the 
> >> running.                           
> >>        Still if it is a close race would any individuals vote 
> > really 
> >> count, would it break a tie. The odds is probally greater on 
> > winning 
> >> the big lottery and getting struck by lighting going to the 
polls 
> > and 
> >> coming back.
> >> 
> >> --- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> >> > --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > You're correct.  She shouldn't run on the Libertarian 
> > ticket.   She
> >> > would be 
> >> > > more appropriately lined up with the Green Party or the 
> > Liberal  
> >> Party. 
> >> > >  
> >> > > David Hughes
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > What do you base that statement on?
> >> > 
> >> >         $






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to