So then, Ronald Reagan, identified by the Christian Science Monitor as the ultimate NeoCon, is a "Zionist NeoCon" who led us into a police state.
David, can I quote you on that? I mean after all, the NeoCons are evil, right. And worse, they are "Jews"! --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, since you have apparently been unable to understand so far, > we do not hate America. Some of us hate the Zionist neocons who have > captured "our" government and are leading us into a police state, World > War III and a one-world totalitarian government. I suspect that many > average Americans who love America would respond quite vigorously > to "our" leaders if they knew what was happening. That fact should > be immensely encouraging to those of us who are spreading truth and > defending liberty and looking forward to the day when the American > people become aware of what is being done to them. > > For life and liberty, > David Macko > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 3:40 PM > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Cindy Sheehan, Libertarian for President? > > > > Why should this be an issue? Why should you be worried that she's > > more of a "big government Progressive Democrat?" After all the > > Libertarian Left has basically morphed into an arm of the Democrat > > Party. There's no distinguishing any more between Leftist America- > > hating Libertarians and Leftist America-hating Liberals. They are > > one in the same. Where's the difference? When's the last time you > > heard a Leftist Libertarian criticizing a Leftist Democrat on > > anything? > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I haven't really looked into it much but from the soundbites I > > have > >> heard from her it appears she is a big government Progressive > > Democrat. > >> Of course soundbites can be edited. > >> > >> Either way I can understand libertarians encouraging her to run > > against > >> Hillary in the Senate Primary in 2006 and the Democratic > > Presidential > >> primary in 2008 and maybe even voting for her in the primaries if > > a > >> libertarian or a close libertarian is not running in the primaries > > if > >> it would help knock H Clinton out of the > >> running. > >> Still if it is a close race would any individuals vote > > really > >> count, would it break a tie. The odds is probally greater on > > winning > >> the big lottery and getting struck by lighting going to the polls > > and > >> coming back. > >> > >> --- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > > >> > > You're correct. She shouldn't run on the Libertarian > > ticket. She > >> > would be > >> > > more appropriately lined up with the Green Party or the > > Liberal > >> Party. > >> > > > >> > > David Hughes > >> > > >> > > >> > What do you base that statement on? > >> > > >> > $ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
