Yes, we can discuss it next, after this ongoing exchange.
Anna
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: gclark809 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 11:16 PM
  Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....


  Did you read all three chapters which is about the equal of 70 
  printed pages???

  Perhaps you can enlighten us with which aspects of the Austrian 
  theories of subjective value and time preference you disagree.

  --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > I do not believe it refutes Marx. 
  > I certainly believe there should be some earnings on borrowed 
  money, the question only is how much.
  > Anna
  >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   From: gclark809 
  >   To: [email protected] 
  >   Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:53 PM
  >   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
  > 
  > 
  >   I have no idea what is meant here by "exploitation" but if it is 
  >   Marx's concept, that was demolished in 1890!  See:
  > 
  >   http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbCI.html
  > 
  >   It starts:
  > 
  >   "BOOK VI 
  >   THE EXPLOITATION THEORY 
  > 
  >   -----------------------
  > 
  >   Book VI, Chapter I 
  > 
  >   Historical Survey  
  >     
  >   We come now to that remarkable theory the enunciation of which, 
  if 
  >   not the most agreeable among the scientific events of our 
  century, 
  >   certainly promises to be one of the most serious in its 
  consequences. 
  >   It stood at the cradle of modern Socialism and has grown up along 
  >   with it; and to-day it forms the theoretical centre around which 
  move 
  >   the forces of attack and defence in the struggle of organising 
  human 
  >   society. 
  > 
  >   VI.I.1 
  >   This theory has as yet no short distinctive name. If I were to 
  give 
  >   it one from a characteristic of its chief professors, I should 
  call 
  >   it the Socialist theory of interest. If I were to try to indicate 
  by 
  >   the name the theoretic purport of the doctrine itself,-which to 
  my 
  >   mind would be more appropriate,-no name seems more suitable than 
  that 
  >   of the Exploitation theory. This accordingly is the name I shall 
  use 
  >   in the sequel. Condensed into a few sentences, the essence of the 
  >   theory may be provisionally put thus. 
  > 
  >   VI.I.2 
  >   All goods that have value are the product of human labour, and 
  >   indeed, economically considered, are exclusively the product of 
  human 
  >   labour. The labourers, however, do not retain the whole product 
  which 
  >   they alone have produced; for the capitalists take advantage of 
  their 
  >   command over the indispensable means of production, as secured to 
  >   them by the institution of private property, to secure to 
  themselves 
  >   a part of the labourers' product. The means of doing so are 
  supplied 
  >   by the wage contract, in which the labourers are compelled by 
  hunger 
  >   to sell their labour-power to the capitalists for a part of what 
  >   they, the labourers, produce, while the remainder of the product 
  >   falls as profit into the hands of the capitalists, without any 
  >   exertion on their part. Interest is thus a portion of the product 
  of 
  >   other people's labour, obtained by exploiting the necessitous 
  >   condition of the labourer."
  > 
  >   He goes on to completely refute the "labor theory" of value and 
  >   Marx's idea of the "exploitation of the "working class."
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >   >
  >   > Yes, but how do you prevent exploitation of the needy ones? One 
  >   person may have 10 kids to support, another 1.
  >   > When they apply for the job,  the pay offered may be  good 
  enough 
  >   for a single kid parent, but not the other parent.
  >   > Would you say then the choice of having so many kids means that 
  a 
  >   person chooses to be poorer?
  >   > Anna
  >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   >   From: Paul 
  >   >   To: [email protected] 
  >   >   Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:59 PM
  >   >   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   >   WE don't decide.  THEY do.  If they apply for a job and are 
  >   offered a
  >   >   job, they can negotiate with the business what their salary 
  is 
  >   worth
  >   >   based on their skills, education, and experience.  If the 
  business
  >   >   isn't offering what they want, they don't have to take it.  
  They 
  >   can
  >   >   apply somewhere else.  If they accept the offer, they are 
  agreeing
  >   >   that this is the value of their labor.
  >   > 
  >   >   The market and free will determine the value.
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   >   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  wrote:
  >   >   >
  >   >   > Mark, some people may need a job, any job and this  gives a 
  >   chance
  >   >   for abuse by employers. 
  >   >   > So my question was, how we decide the values and worth? 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > Anna
  >   >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   >   >   From: mark robert 
  >   >   >   To: [email protected] 
  >   >   >   Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:07 AM
  >   >   >   Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   Ana,
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   You need to go ask the two who are engaged in the business
  >   >   >   relationship. I assume you will be told "yes". Or save 
  >   yourself
  >   >   >   the effort and deduce your answer by observing their 
  actions -
  >   if
  >   >   >   it's not just, why would we be voluntarily doing it?
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   -Mark
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >     _____  
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   This  is the whole issue:
  >   >   >   Is the physical work worth more than  thinking or doing 
  deals?
  >   >   >   The   same? 
  >   >   >   You claim that the guy who does the thinking deserves to 
  get
  >   >   >   more.
  >   >   >   This means that the worker's effort in building the house 
  is
  >   >   >   worth less than the guy's who did not lift a finger doing 
  the
  >   >   >   construction job.
  >   >   >   Is it just?
  >   >   >   Anna 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >     _____  
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government 
  >   strategy  
  >   >   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >
  >   >   --------------------------------------------------------------
  ----
  >   ------------
  >   >   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
  >   >   >       
  >   >   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  >   >   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >   >   >       
  >   >   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
  >   Terms of
  >   >   Service. 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   >
  >   >   --------------------------------------------------------------
  ----
  >   ------------
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > 
  >   >   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >   >   >
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government 
  strategy  
  >   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  ----
  >   ----------
  >   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
  >   > 
  >   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
  >   >       
  >   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  >   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >   >       
  >   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
  Terms 
  >   of Service. 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  ----
  >   ----------
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > 
  >   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >   >
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
  >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
  > 
  > 
  > --------------------------------------------------------------------
  ----------
  >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
  > 
  >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
  >       
  >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >       
  >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
  of Service. 
  > 
  > 
  > --------------------------------------------------------------------
  ----------
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >







  ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



  SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
        Libertarian party  E government procurement  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to