From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Borders are irrelevant? You are digging a deeper and deeper hole and > you're never going to get out. Your right to property does not > entitle you to sell it on the property of another person. Borders > absolutely do matter, whether or not you own the property does > not.
Either the Right to Property is unconditional or it is conditional. You are saying that it depends upon where the property came from that matters as to how much of it i control. Whether or not I have justly acquired the property is the ONLY question that matters. What I do with it does not concern you unless you wish to buy it. > Your claims are as ridiculous as someone saying, "Because I own my > property, the borders of your land are irrelevant. I can sell my > goods anywhere I want including on your front lawn and if you make me > leave, you are aggressing against me." The borders of your land are only relevant where you have title. It is not your lawn we are talking about, it is my lawn and my goods and my market. You are uninvolved in it. If you come and try to take part of my transaction from either my buyer or myself you are a thief and have initiated aggression. BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
