A definition or article found in wikipedia is no more credible than anything Paul says in this thread, not that you couldn't find a more credible source with a definition suiting your stand. It would jsut be better if you used something that had some sort of standard of quality.
The world knew Iraq mustard gas, Iraq used Mustard gas. That does not constitute a renewed WMD program, which had been clearly implied as a nuclear program by the BUsh administration. That activated WMD program, and nuclear weapons research did not exhist. Inteligence before the war also clearly suggested that it did not exhist, but documents were altered, as key sentances such as "We asses individual is lying and using counter interigation tactics" and "Individuals claims are likely false as individual was never in a position to aquire this knowledge" to paint the story that was desired. Its easy to dislike Bush for me, and impossible for me to hate America. It is infact my love of America that causes my great anger and frustration over Bush and his blind supporters. --- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote: > > > > Wrong. Mustard gas is NOT a WMD. Not a chance. Mustard gas is an > > effective weapon, but not one that causes MASS destruction. WMDs are > > various nukes, bio-weapons, etc. but NOT mustard gas. > > > > Suggesting that the chemicals needed to make mustard gas are a WMD is > > a feeble attempt to stretch the truth beyond its breaking point. > > Notice I said the chemicals needed to make mustard gas, and not > > mustard gas itself which was never found. So even if someone were > > to call mustard gas a WMD, all that was found in the Tigris river > > were the components that MIGHT be used to create mustard gas. > > > > Once again, NO WMDs WERE FOUND. > > > > While it may serve the needs of those who hate America and the > President, emotion should be replaced by research and facts, two > things which seem to go out the window first when these topics come up. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wmd > > Chemical weapons are ABSOLUTELY included in the definition of WMD, > including the current LEGAL definition in 18 U.S.C. Section 2332a. > > Of course, these facts make it more difficult to hate G.W., but that > won't stop the good self-hating Americans from persisting in theri > fantasies. > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
