You two's posts consist of lavish indulgence in State-sponsored
phobia. Pop-quiz: Which is more likely to steal America's
freedoms: a) Islam terrorism; b) phobia of said terrorism?
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
--- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Isn't it amazing the inconsistency of the libertarian
> anti-War advocacy Geoff?
>
> They claim they support civil liberties, but say absolutely
nothing
> about the Islamo-fascist murder of Theo van Gogh in the
Netherlands.
> They don't care at all about the rising tide of Islamo-fascists
> threatening and sometimes physically attacking Gays,
> Lesbians, Marijuana smokers, Nudists, and other Alternative
> Lifestyles champions throughout Western Europe. They don't say
a
> peep about authoritarianism using Islam as a pretext for
violent
> riots all across Europe over silly little cartoon depictions of
> the "Prophet" Muhammed. They say nothing when the paranoia
even
> seeps into the US, like Borders pulling Free Inquiry off their
> shelves for fear of violent authoritarian reprisals that use
Islam
> as pretext.
>
> It's almost like to the Anti-War Libertarianism, Social
Freedoms be
> damned. If it conflicts with a hard Left hate Bush Pacifistic
> agenda, Social Freedoms get thrown out like a baby in the bath
> water.
>
For a long time I have pointed out how the Libertarian anti Bush
crowd
sounds exactly like the Socialist Left. I beieve that both of
these
groups have personalized the issue and are blinded by their hate
for
Bush. If they have their way, I see the free people of the US
attacked more often and more viciously by the Islamofascists
until
abreaking point would be reached. At that time, it would be like
after Pearl arbor and total war would be waged with a far more
damaging and destructive cost than defeating the terrorists
earlier.
This campaign against the terrorists should consist of political
as
well as military measures, but, in my study of human nature, I
have
come to the conclusion that the type of hate, intolerene, and
prejudice we are confronted with can only be defeated by
eliminating
it rather then 'talking to the terrorists.'
That is one reason why I am not really worried about the
Libertarians
who refuse to acknowledge the Islamofascist threat. The end
result
may unfortunately be more bodies, but I believe freedom will
prevail.
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
