To equate the trivial problem of Muslim terrorism abroad to the enormous and horrible problem of the drug war here at home gives way too much much credit to the terrorists, and blows any possible threat they might have way out of proportion.
--- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote: > > > > I can not only play YOUR game by YOUR rules (your bad logic and > > criteria), I can still defend my position over yours by a large > > margin. Granted you have expanded your list of atrocities. Even > > though they are in other countries; that's OK. Even though they > > are more atrocious; that's OK. I can easily top that with > > absolute credibility without itemizing anything - with one > > sentence: > > > > **There are far more and far worse atrocities committed around > > the world in the name of the drug war.** > > > > The difference is there is a political process available to change the > law and end the drug war. There is no political process with terrorists. > > To extend your logic, then all law is designed to inspire terror. I > disagree with this. A nation living under the rule of law is the best > form of government we have devised yet, even with all its imperfections. > > The drug war may be bad policy, but to equate it with terroism > devalues the definition of terrorism. > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
