Bod, of course; that's the 'default' sans any other conditions to which one has given informed consent.
That's the ideal, but in our less than ideal world we end up having to do it the other way around :( -Terry Liberty Parker 'Real world' experiment in LIBERTARIAN community became famous at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569 --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Boyd, I agree; but, I think a good arrangement to safeguard > > the environment of a community is for it to be proprietary. > > > > Not at all 'radical' is the notion of condominium(sp?) or > > so called 'gated' communities. Govt attempts to undermine > > private property rights should be repealed. None of this is > > to say that *I* endorse any and all things contrived by each > > community; but that's freedom. The 'default' position is > > reciprocal physical comprehensive autonomy for each person. > > > > Libertarianism says that if you WANT a certain environment > > beyond that to be imposed upon your community, BUY IT! > > On the other hand, if I own a piece of property, there is no right of anyone else to dictate what consensual activities I and those on my property engage in. Any attempt to come on my property and stop them is by NAP an act of aggression and I may retaliate to the extent of the violation. > > BWS > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
