It's a rediculous statement, the problem is not getting me to admit that it is as much. The problem, wich I am sure is not yours, is getting Terry to admit that his is similarly rediculous. I doubt I have the mastery of words to convince either of you of that.
One who will accept some now, and work for more later, is not some evil agressor bent on decieving and controlling you. They have a valid point of view that all or nothing is not the best way. In practice Terry might understand that, but his constant posting of this little blurb is a constant assault and those with a different point of view. In a very real way it is that inapropriate personal attack that will get your posts moderated though terry is the moderator. One who speaks a different point of view, becasue it is there genuine point of view, and asks only to be heard, and does not judge your differing point of view is NOT an agressor. The same can not be said for one who would demonize he who thinks differently. --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Assuming you are being serious, where is your evidence of > "violation" and "aggression" from those who "promote unlimited > Libertarianism"? If you can't provide any, at least supply a > theoretical example of what you are talking about. Or maybe you > didn't write that yourself? > > > > > > ************ > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > unjust lawsuits. > See www.fija.org > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > > _____ > > > > 'Freedom' to violate you and yours > is at the heart of UNLIMITED 'libertarianism' > > In an apparent attempt to impose > the continuing philosophic idealogy > of extreem libertarianism, there is a push > to demonize the pragmatists who seek real change. > Now that the comfortable obscurity of Libertariansm > has essentially fallen, the banner of 'liberty' becomes > a hijacking target of the 'consistant libertarians.' Aggressors > who > eagerly want to maintain that only they know what truely is > 'liberty' > with no 'exceptions' to what they want to see construed as THE > UNIVERSAL view of libertarianism. > > > Don't hate me Terry :) > > > > > > _____ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
