Anarchy was defined long before you were concieved as a concept yourself Boyd. We can not seek to redifine terms to fit individual needs with out losing the meaning of speach.
Notice it says cohesive, not coercive. Anarchy 1)Absence of any form of political authority. 2)Political disorder and confusion. 3)Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose. --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was attempting to define the concept of anarchy as the lack of a formal coercive state. > > BWS > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:14 pm > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration > > > Boyd, I did not follow or understand what you've said here :( > > > > Would you please re-phrase and make clear how what *I* said is > > also leading to what you're representing? > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > please see what I wrote in Govt is.... > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/47139 > > > > > > --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote: > > > > > > Then by this logical reasoning anarchy is only the absents of a > > formal state and the (always in each and every case) attendant > > initiation of force which is the basis and substance of any formal > > state. > > > > > > BWS > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Terry L Parker <txliberty@> > > > Date: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:52 am > > > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration > > > > > > > Boyd, yes of course; as you said, it's 'self-government' > > > > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > > > Govt is... > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/47139 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: Andr? Kenji de Sousa <andrekenjilistas@> > > > > > > 2006/4/13, boyd.w.smith@ <boyd.w.smith@>: > > > > > > > Wrong again. Anarchy as used in this sense means > > anarcho- > > > > > > capitalism. Context must be taken into account in human > > to > > > > human > > > > > > communication. If you take words out of the context in > > which > > > > they > > > > > > are used you are distorting the meaning of the > > communicator's > > > > > > statement. > > > > > > > > > > > Anarchy is simply the absence of government. You don´t > > have > > to > > > > be > > > > an > > > > > > anarcho-socialist or an anarcho-capitalist to be an anarchist. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > André > > > > > > > > > > And then you get into the various definitions and catagories > > of > > > > government. If someone self governs themselves is that > > government? > > > > > > > > > > BWS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
