Fine I have already stated that I will start using the terms anarco capitalism and formal aggressive state to describe the positions that i and Paul hold. He is, as evidenced by his statements on this list, in favor of a formal state that infringes upon individual rights much like the current government given to us by the constitution. I on the other hand am in favor of freedom, liberty, peace, NAP/ZAP/RPAT, and capitalism.
BWS ----- Original Message ----- From: uncoolrabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, April 14, 2006 4:19 am Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration > Actualy that remains inkeeping with many definitions of Anarchy > Boyd. It would be best to admit that Anarchy is NOT what you > support > so the sensless argument with Paul could end and you could both > argue about something that intrests me more ;) > > Anarchy > Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or > purpose. > > While I am at it, Libertarian > One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the > role of the state. > > Neither are my definition of Anarchy and Libertarian, as I know > both > of these terms were defined long before I was. > > --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > How about every attempt at anarchy that has ever been made > during the > > > entire history of the planet earth? Is that good enough for > you? > > > This of course includes the non-anarchy in iceland that > anarchists > > > claim was a paradise, and it includes more recent examples of > > > oppression, chaos, murder, rape, theft, and warlords fighting > each > > > other to control people like Somalia. > > > > Be specific. Which attempts? > > > > Iceland had statist elements that caused it to fail. That is an > established fact. The very things you wish to include in the > interactions between humans caused an almost ideal situation to > sour > and become authoritarian. > > > > Somalia - you defined it yourself. "oppression, chaos, murder, > rape, theft, and warlords fighting each other to control people > like > Somalia." Therefore not in keeping with anyone's definition of an > Anarchy. Except for the one that you and you alone use. > > > > No matter what you say, no many how many times you repeat the > lie, > a Anarchy is not what you say it is. It is exactly peaceful > voluntary cooperation between people. > > > > BWS > > > > BWS > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
