From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Which is pretty much the case. If there were no government to protect > your private property ownership, you could only keep what you could > defend, and there will always be someone bigger, stronger, and tougher > than you who can take what's yours and in anarchy, you'd have no > recourse when they did other than some sort of vigilante justice with > a lynch mob or something.
Of course that completely ignores the fact that you could hire security to protect you life and property and that without the government stealing your property and corrupt police not doing the jobs that they are paid to do, you could afford Brinks, Sonitrol, or whomever to be the police for you, and it would be much more efficient and customer responsive than what we have today. And in anarcho-capitalism there would be much more wealth to go around and much less incentive to engage in violence. BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
