[Libertarian] Re: The Drug War Debate

Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:35:19 -0700

I'm not saying that everyone who sales drugs or who will ever sale
drugs will never abuse people in the sale but we have both civil and
crimnal courts for abusing others. I say the same thing about this
that I told Paul on the Traiff issue the  state or the plantiff must
prove their case before a jury to show not only that the defendent is
going against legislation but that the legislation is constitutional
and in accordance with natural and common law, plus that the
legislation or constitutional article applies in this case and that
the sentence, fine or debt is relativent to this case, maybe in this
case it should be lower, a jury can show mercy. Judging Case by case
is much better than most any legislation if not all legislation above
the intentional neighborhood level, at the intentional level members
can forbid almost any substance that members want banned. They can
even ban those pink flamango statues on lawns.--- In
[email protected], "wgilbert02" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My uncertanty primarily revolves around hardcore narcotics such as
> crack, meth, acid, etc., not petty marijuana. 
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote:
> >
> > William,
> >
> > Good. My favorite topic!
> >
> > But a more efficient route might be to have you tell us on which
> > drug prohibition issues (which drugs?) you straddle the fence and
> > why.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > 
> >
> > ************
> > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> > unjust lawsuits.
> > See www.fija.org 
> > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wgilbert02
> > Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 10:25 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Libertarian] The Drug War Debate
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've noticed that this board has a lot of references to ending
> > the drug
> > war.  To be honest, I have yet to determine whether I am for or
> > against
> > legalizing currently illegal drugs.  I was wondering if anyone
> > here
> > could offer the arguments either for or against legalizing drugs
> > and
> > perhaps what form this would take.  I'm not trying to get an
> > argument
> > started here.  This is simply an area in which I am on the fence.
> >
> > Thanks
> > William
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian English language Political parties
Online dictionary American politics

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Reply via email to