Re: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

[Cory Nott]

The idea that it is a PRIVILEGE to sell goods in one's own country is generally regarded as fascism. Not only that but setting a percentage rate imposes higher costs on those who can afford to import more, even though the protective border services provided to them may be the same or even less. Pauls falls right into the old Marxist trap - from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
   
   
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  So then lacking any coherent or objective criteria for determining what is and is not a tax, you decide on arbitrary whim?

BWS

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:35 pm
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

> Wrong.  Both governments have been placed in charge of the borders of
> each nation and it doesn't matter if someone owns land within the
> nation, just that they are bringing goods from one nation into
> another.  Each nation is placed in charge of guarding the borders of
> that nation and granted the authority to charge tariffs on behalf of
> those who live in the country as a PRIVILEGE to sell goods within that
> country.


ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



  SPONSORED LINKS 
        Libertarian   English language   Political parties     Online dictionary   American politics 
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.