things.
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
------------------
What about the act of going to court? If one is being sued or has
been
charged with a crime and they are defended or represented by an
attorney in court is that acceptance of the court ruling either
way?
$
--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Grier Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Actually, If you look at it *this* way (I am starting to), if
you
> > voted AT ALL,
> > you are personally responsible for everything that government
does.
> >
> > The act of voting signifies that you accept the outcome of a
vote,
> > either way.
> >
> > grier
>
>
> I disagree. Whether or not you accept the results does not
mean you
are responsible for the actions of the one who actually does win.
No
matter who you voted for. That person did the actions and they
are
responsible.
>
> BWS
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
