outright lie about my statements Terry? I attribute HUMANESS to the
fetus Terry. The response was to Paul, who does not merely argue
that a fetus does not fit a definition of personhood. Paul outright
claims that a human fetus is not human despite the fact that it is
indead a human fetus, not a baboon fetus, not an antelope fetus not
anything like that. My post remains below yours to remind you that
not once did I use the word Personhood in it.
--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On what basis do you assert that the property of personhood be
> attributed to a pre-born human individual?
>
> Please see what I wrote in this forum as
> 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100
>
>
> -Terry Liberty Parker
> http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <uncoolrabbit@>
> wrote:
> >
> > A much better statement of yourpoint of view than recently, but
> > you "obviously are trying to" strip the human atrribute from a
> human
> > organism, just as the slaver or the fascist before you. :)
> >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
