http://www.l4l.org/library/index.html#LFL%20Literature%20List
Here are some of the best ones:
Abortion and Rights: Applying Libertarian Principles Properly
by Doris Gordon http://www.l4l.org/library/abor-rts.html
When Do Human Beings Begin? "Scientific" Myths and
Scientific Facts by Dianne N. Irving, M.A., PhD
http://www.l4l.org/library/mythfact.html
Being Pro-Life Is Necessary to Defend Liberty
by Dr. Ron Paul
http://www.l4l.org/library/bepro-rp.html
An Exchange Between David F Nolan and Doris Gordon
http://www.l4l.org/library/bepro-rp.html
Summary: Although all religions except those which practice
human sacrifice agree that human life is sacred from conception,
Libertarians For Life bases its position solely on non-religious,
scientific evidence.
1. Al scientific evidence indicates that human life begins at conception.
2. Aggression against human life at any point between conception
and natural death is contrary to the libertarian non-aggression and
libertarian self-ownership principles.
3. Even if you are not sure when human life begins you should follow
the principle of hunters and not try to kill anything until you are sure
what it is.
4. To allow any government to determine who is and who is not a
human being (especially by mere circumstance of location as his
or her mother's womb) gives the government the power to rob everyone
of our liberties.
For life and liberty,
David Macko
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Badnarik on Immigration
> David, since people are generally disinclined to go read the entire
> contents of what they may see as a 'propaganda' site, wouldn't it be
> helpful for you to 'cut&paste' relevant excerpts along with their
> URLs?
>
> -Terry Liberty Parker
> Please see what I wrote in-
> 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently you still have not had enough time to completely
>> read all of the information at www.l4l.org.
>>
>> For life and liberty,
>> David Macko
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:48 AM
>> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Badnarik on Immigration
>>
>>
>> >A zygote is not a human being. It does not possess human life.
> it has
>> > the POTENTIAL for human life, but does not have it. Separate DNA
> does
>> > not amount to human life. A fetus is not a whole human being. A
>> > whole human being is a fully sentient person and a fetus is not.
> We
>> > can use Terry's definition of person if you choose.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <uncoolrabbit@>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> A sperm cell is not human life but it has the potential to be, a
>> >> human egg cell is not human life but it has the potential to be
> so.
>> >> A human fetus is not a piece of one human whole such as your
> arm, it
>> >> is itself a human whole. You would be wiser to cop out and
> follow
>> >> Terry's lead of personhood, as a human fetus is human. If you
> sever
>> >> your arm its self mutilation, suggesting problems that I am not
>> >> trained to deal with.
>> >>
>> >> --- In [email protected], "Paul" <tireland@> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > My arm is a human arm. It has human DNA, and it's alive. If
> I
>> >> sever
>> >> > my arm, have I murdered someone? Human life is different from
> any
>> >> > other. Human life belongs to people (aka persons).
>> >> >
>> >> > Here are a list of things that do NOT qualify as HUMAN life.
>> >> >
>> >> > A beating heart
>> >> > A cerebral cortex
>> >> > A nervous system
>> >> > Human DNA
>> >> > Reflexive Actions or response to painful stimuli
>> >> > Head, Torso, Hands, Feet, Fingers, Toes, Eyes, Ears, Nose, or
> Mouth
>> >> > The shape of a human being
>> >> >
>> >> > An acorn is not an oak tree but it has the POTENTIAL to be
> one.
>> >> Dough
>> >> > is not bread, but it has the POTENTIAL to be. A fetus is not
> a
>> >> human
>> >> > being but it has the POTENTIAL to be one.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit"
> <uncoolrabbit@>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On what basis do you feel it appropriate to twist, contort
> and
>> >> > > outright lie about my statements Terry? I attribute HUMANESS
> to
>> >> the
>> >> > > fetus Terry. The response was to Paul, who does not merely
> argue
>> >> > > that a fetus does not fit a definition of personhood. Paul
>> >> outright
>> >> > > claims that a human fetus is not human despite the fact that
> it
>> >> is
>> >> > > indeed a human fetus, not a baboon fetus, not an antelope
> fetus
>> >> not
>> >> > > anything like that. My post remains below yours to remind
> you
>> >> that
>> >> > > not once did I use the word Personhood in it.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
>> >> <tx liberty@>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On what basis do you assert that the property of
> personhood be
>> >> > > > attributed to a pre-born human individual?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Please see what I wrote in this forum as
>> >> > > > 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
>> >> > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > -Terry Liberty Parker
>> >> > > > http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit"
>> >> <uncoolrabbit@>
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > A much better statement of your point of view than
> recently,
>> >> but
>> >> > > > > you "obviously are trying to" strip the human attribute
> from
>> >> a
>> >> > > > human
>> >> > > > > organism, just as the slaver or the fascist before
> you. :)
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
